Sunday, 20 July 2008

On Church and Government

I caught an interesting snippet on Radio 4 the other day while driving: an interview with Aziz Tamimi and Hazel Blears about the proposed expert board of Muslims that the Government are trying to set up. The board, albeit allegedly independent and set up with the assistance of Oxford and Cambridge Universities, is to interpret matters and then disseminate their findings to help 'guide' Muslims in this country to stop "Islamic beliefs being misused by those seeking to promote extremism or reinforce certain cultural practices".

Why am I writing about Islam when I'm a Witch? The thing that struck me is the sheer arrogance and manipulation of the Government in this matter - and it has parallels for The Craft. While arguing that the board can help interpret such things as wearing the veil, the major thrust is to persuade youngsters away from radicalism. This small, disenfranchised group are supposed to take note of the guidance and then change tack. Aziz Tamimi made an interesting point that even by instigating the set-up of the board, it would make the very people it was intended to influence suspicious of the advice and all that goes with it - which made sense to me.

It seems that the Government have a huge difficulty with Islam because there is no "church", i.e.the centralised hierarchy that more familiar religions offer. Islam doesn't have an Archbishop of Canterbury or a Jonathan Sacks, and the Government can't cope. So, rather than deal with the real problems and take away the root causes and problems that radicalise youngsters, our wise leaders have decided to try to mould Islam into something more familiar and recognisable.

My understanding of Islam is that each Imam is independent; he teaches within the faith and uses the Quaran, but will work with the people for whom he has pastoral responsibility as adviser and interpreter. If an Imam should appear to the Government as too uncomfortably radical or not towing the line they want, at the moment there's nothing they can do, because there isn't an Islamic Big Cheese who can deal with the 'dodgy' Imam. I do believe that current moves are the thin end of the wedge in attempts to reshape the form of Islam in this country. And if I think that, I'd guess that the very people this board is meant to reach may be thinking similar things.

So what's it got to do with me? Well, there have been extensive discussions on The Green Witch here and here and on Star of Seshat, as well as Magicfortherealworld about making The Craft more organised and structured.

While Islam had functioned rather well over past decades as a loose community of believers and their immediate spiritual leaders, there are moves afoot to try to turn Witchcraft into another clone of western religious structure. And here's the danger: if the Government can control the Big Cheese at the top of any system, or bring to bear the sorts of pressures that only governments can, they will not only do so, but in the act blur the clear line between secular and spiritual.

Many people I know have argued that The Craft should not go the same way structurally as, for instance, Christianity, for the simple question of who regulates the person at the top? There has to be a system of checks and balances and in creating a pyramid structure, the apex is vulnerable both to pressure and to corruption. It may be that many Muslims would feel uncomfortable with the thought of having their religion compared to Witchcraft, but in terms of a loose, flat structure and the ability to remain an amorphous, fluid mass that is flexible, able to balance itself out and adapt, there are parallels.

There is an insidious danger in allowing government to interfere with religious life - in this case, they are fudging the issue of extremism, even with the experience of Northern Ireland and hundreds of years of history, and by setting up the Islamic board, they can effectively wash their hands of the problem in the future and roundly shift the blame. The only way to stop people becoming radicalised is to deal with the desperation and feeling of disempowerment and disenfranchsiement that allows it to happen in the first place.

In the meantime, we see the beginnings of an old religion being shoe-horned into a more malleable format and that does not bode well for Witchcraft.

4 Comments:

At 20 July 2008 19:56 , OpenID wiccanwanderings said...

Agreed, Mereth. We have the perfect example of what not to do in terms of religion and governance in the USA right now - and despite the fact that Islam is not formed under a titular head like Christianity is, it must be an internal change that manages radicalism, not a political manoeuvre.

 
At 21 July 2008 14:10 , OpenID Abdur Rahman said...

Peace Mereth,

An interesting post. There is much in what you say that I would agree with. I didn't hear the Radio 4 programme, but have often heard this kind of thing before.

That Islam doesn't have a Big Cheese, as such, has meant that the government has tried to create 'voices' it can talk to in the past (such as the Muslim Council of Britain) - the problem comes when that 'voice' disagrees with govt policy (or else the govt changes) - which is really what the whole hoo-hah with the MCB a while ago was all about.

The issue of govt involvement in change doesn't worry me in itself, though it probably would mean that the target audience wouldn't listen.

As for the Pagan community, which contains perhaps even greater theological diversity, I would imagine that this kind of initiative would be deeply problematic.

Abdur Rahman

 
At 22 July 2008 12:50 , Blogger The Shepton Witch said...

Blessings Abdur,

Indeed, the troubles of MCB just highlights the stupidity of the whole situation - set up a council and as soon as it doesn't exactly suit the flavour of Muslim required this month, set up something to replace it as an interface. It's absurd, but worse, it's arrogant and dangerous.

I worry that over the past ten years government has increasingly legislated by knee-jerk. Rather than act in measured and statesman-like way, I see a bunch of career politicians, rather than conviction driven leaders rushing around to make the right sound-byte for the moment.

Looking at the latest kerfuffle over inner city stabbings of teenagers, when you look at the figures and long term trends, there isn't a sudden escalation in knife crime - just a media spotlight upon it. So, rather than take the harder route of exposing this fact and putting in place measures that will have an effect in the long term, like places for these youngsters to go and activities that they can become involved in (which of course takes money, and who would want to damage the budget for the John Lewis list?), some idiot proposes banning the sale of knives with points.

What substance were they on? Apart from seeing what could be done with a cleaver, had they even slightly engaged their brain, they would not only have seen the sheer imbecility of the idea, they might even have seen what a plank it made them look - sadly, I suspect they really don't have the ability to see either.

Enough of sounding off about stupid politicians, the worrying trend is that government will tinker with whatever it feels will give them a quick fix, and state and religion should either be explicitly linked or kept apart.

In some ways, the failure of a recent petition to Tony Blair to recognise The Craft as a religion in the UK and recognise Handfastings as legal matrimonial bonds was disappointing. In other ways, I think that as a completely disorganised groundswell of belief and direction, we may be safer from interference, it's a double-edged sword.

 
At 23 July 2008 19:07 , Blogger maylin said...

A really interesting and thought provoking post - thank you. I might be inclined to say it is better not even to have definitions. Once you are pidgeon holed you are in danger of being identified and persecuted, manipulated and contolled. OOps that sounds a little paranoid doesn't it?

 

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home